Interpretation machine



Dec. 7, 1965 Filed Dec. 30, 1960 J- P. LAZARUS INTERPRETATION MACHINE 8O Sheets-Sheet 1 INPUT DECISION PARAMETER INVOLVING oRDER OF M'AGNITUDE DETERMINATION SENSING MEDIUM 2 127 /7 EVALUATION MEDIUM EXPERIENCE PROBABILlTY CR'TER'ON vAI uE"N" 6 58 3A 5 I COMPARISON OF EXPERIENCE WITH FURTHER EXPERIEN CE COMPARISON OF "N" WITH EXPERIENCE UTILIZATION MEDIUM FIG.1

INVENTOR JOHN P LAZARUS BY ATTORNEY Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS 3,222,650

INTERPRETATION MACHINE Filed Dec. 30, 1960 80 Sheets-Sheet 2 O 14 a E.

d FIG. 2

A RESET B 31- %32 27% a 28 OR a OFF SIDE /23F OFF SIDE FIG.3 t K 29 no 305d Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS INTERPRETATION MACHINE 80 Sheets-Sheet 3 Filed Dec. 30, 1960 43 RESET CHANGE FIG.4

2 w/ 8 6/ Q/ &

1 3 w 5/. R R m E O 9 5/ W 4 W o w c n on n n 4 8 a 5 4 4 @A 4 FIG.5

Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS INTERPRETATION MACHINE Filed Dec. 30. 1960 FIG.?

NWB NB NEB 74 75\ MWB ML MEB EB sws SB s 76/UWB UL UEB LWB LL LEB PEN.|NNB

) SB PLL 77 PEN.|NSB

FIG.1O

LBVL' ORDER OF .SLOPED EAST SHORE OF SB FIG. 11

so Sheets-Sheet 5 FIG. 12

Fl G,

FIG. FIG. FIG. 126G 12HH|2II 15335 O QI FIG.

Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS INTERPRETATION MACHINE 8O Sheets-Sheet 6 Filed Dec. 50. 1960 Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS INTERPRETATION MACHINE o Sheets-Sheet 8 Filed Dec. 30. 1960 mmq mmw

ONF 07.

1m Eu Om? zm Eu Tmm w Tw oww mom Omn= Tm 5 52% T mwm Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS INTERPRETATION MACHINE 80 Sheets-Sheet 9 Filed Dec. 30, 1960 zuhwaum T am" Tam m5;

NOm

N HE;

Nnm

7w wiu mmm Tm 08 was 'Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS 3,222,650

INTERPRETATION MACHINE Filed Dec. 30. 1960 80 Sheets-Sheet 10 9mm Tm 9mm 2% N Tm N 9mm m w 25 $5 $3 v 5 Tm Tm Tm mOOQZm wmm w w 0%. E. w 9mm Tm my viu Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS INTERPRETATION MACHINE 80 Sheets-Sheet 11 Filed Dec. 30. 1960 Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS INTERPRETATION MACHINE 80 Sheets-Sheet 12 Filed Dec. 30, 1960 I mjDm .Lbcuomo O mJDm Tmo 80 Sheets-Sheet 15 Filed Dec. 30, 1960 w. wJDm Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS 3,222,650

INTERPRETATION MACHINE Filed Dec. 50, 1960 80 Sheets-Sheet 14 FIG. 12 1 C5 RULE18 RULE 19 RULE 2O RULE 21 Dec. 7, 1965 Filed Dec. 50, 1960 FIG. 12d

RULE 22 J. P. LAZARUS 3,222,650

INTERPRETATION MACHINE 80 Sheets-Sheet 15 RULE 23 Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS INTERPRETATION MACHINE 8O Sheets-Sheet 16 Filed Dec. 30, 1960 xm. QE

Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS 3,222,650

INTERPRETATION MACHINE Filed Dec. 30, 1960 80 Sheets-Sheet 17 RULE 25 Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS 3,222,650

INTERPRETAT ION MACHINE Filed Dec. 30. 1960 80 Sheets-Sheet l8 Fl G. 12 M RULE 28 RULE 29 RULE 30 RULE 31 Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAZARUS INTERPRETATION MACHINE 80 Sheets-Sheet 19 Filed Dec. 50, 1960 I0 mm 04 km M 51 mmS mm M431 Dec. 7, 1965 J. P. LAzARus 3,222,550

INTERPRETATION MACHINE Filed Dec. 50. 1960 so Sheets-Sheet 2o RULE 38 FIGJZO RULE 39 L%% RULE 4o RULE 41 RULE 42 

2. IN AN INFORMATION PROCESSING MACHINE WHEREIN A DECISION IS BASED ON A COMPARISON OF AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE DETERMINATION WITH A CRITERIAN VALUE THE IMPROVEMENT COMPRISING DECISION AUGMENTATION MEANS EMPLOYING A DECISION PROBABILITY BASED ON EXPERIENCE AND FURTHER MEANS INVOLVING INFORMATION FEEDBACK PATHS FOR INTERDEPENDENTLY ALTERING SAID CRITERION VALUE AND SAID DECISION PROBABILITY. 